According to Condillac, without the senses, what would humans know?

According to Condillac, the idea that without the senses, humans would know nothing emphasizes his belief in empiricism—the notion that knowledge originates from sensory experiences. In his view, the mind starts as a blank slate, and all understanding and knowledge are built through the information gathered through the senses. He posited that without sensory input, there would be no raw data for the mind to process, thus leading to the conclusion that without the senses, humans would lack any form of knowledge or understanding of the world. This perspective aligns with the broader philosophical context of empiricism, where experience is central to the acquisition of knowledge. In contrast, the other options suggest some level of inherent knowledge or capability, which Condillac would contest based on his empirical framework.